Earthquake Nucleation Hypotheses

Harvard EPS55

Interactive comparison of Deterministic Pre-slip vs Cascade triggering theories

Deterministic Hypothesis: Gradual aseismic pre-slip in a nucleation zone accelerates until reaching a critical size, triggering the mainshock. Foreshocks are passive markers of the ongoing preparation process.
Time Control
Start Nucleation Mainshock
Fault Segment Evolution
Loading Phase
Stress Level
Nucleation Zone
Passive Foreshocks
Active Triggers
Simulation Parameters

Fault Properties

Deterministic Parameters

Visualization

0.0
Current Time (s)
0.0
Nucleation Size (km)
0
Seismic Events
0.80
Max Stress Level
0.0
Slip Rate (mm/s)
Loading
Current Phase

Understanding Earthquake Nucleation Mechanisms

🎛️ Time Slider Control: Use the time slider to manually control the progression of the earthquake nucleation process. This allows you to observe the critical differences in timing and spatial patterns between the two hypotheses.

🎯 Deterministic Process

  • Gradual Preparation: Watch the nucleation zone (blue outline) grow slowly and steadily
  • Accelerating Pre-slip: Slip rate increases exponentially as critical size approaches
  • Passive Foreshocks: Yellow dots appear as byproducts, not triggers
  • Critical Threshold: Mainshock occurs when zone reaches critical size
  • Predictable Timing: Process follows deterministic laws

🎲 Cascade Process

  • Stochastic Initiation: Starts with random small foreshock event
  • Active Triggering: Each event transfers stress to neighbors (purple lines)
  • Emergent Patterns: Larger events emerge from smaller ones unpredictably
  • Cascading Growth: Chain reaction of increasingly larger events
  • Unpredictable Timing: Mainshock timing depends on random cascade

🔬 Key Observables:

🎮 Interactive Features: Use the time slider to step through the process at your own pace. Switch between hypotheses to compare their signatures. Adjust parameters to explore how fault conditions influence nucleation behavior.